Five months after fabricated educational references pressured South Africa to withdraw its draft nationwide synthetic intelligence (AI) policy, one of many two officers suspended over the scandal has resigned. Disciplinary proceedings towards the opposite communications division staffer are nonetheless beneath means.
Solly Malatsi, South Africa’s communications minister, says the federal government stays assured that Cabinet will finalise the alternative AI policy earlier than the top of March 2027, with public session anticipated to start in April.
But the unfinished disciplinary course of leaves questions on accountability for a scandal that embarrassed a authorities looking for to place South Africa as a continental chief in AI governance.
Malatsi informed TechCabal in an interview on Thursday that the division couldn’t enable the incident to move with out penalties, acknowledging the injury attributable to AI-generated materials use that went undetected throughout the AI policy’s preparation.
“Having such a major stain on an important policy is something that cannot just be allowed to slide,” he stated.
The minister confirmed that the division suspended two officers for failing to disclose AI use in making ready materials that contributed to fabricated references showing within the policy.
“The appropriate processes were followed, and two officials were suspended,” Malatsi stated. “The ongoing processes now relate to the one official who remains an employee of the department.”
In May, TechCabal reported that South Africa withdrew its draft AI policy after fictitious educational references have been found. The setback triggered renewed scrutiny over how generative AI is utilized in policymaking and uncovered weaknesses in authorities oversight.
Malatsi stated the division’s director-general acted after he instructed that these accountable be held accountable.
“It was clear that there had been non-disclosure around the use of AI, which contributed to the hallucinations that emerged in the policy,” he stated.
The minister described the withdrawal as mandatory regardless of the injury it prompted to the federal government’s policymaking course of.
At CollectiveXchange 2026, a nationwide digital abilities and jobs summit, in Johannesburg earlier on Thursday, Malatsi acknowledged that the method had skilled a “false start.” He confused that the federal government was working to full its inside processes earlier than opening the alternative policy to public session.
“Yes, it is very late, and that is the consequence of having a false start,” he informed delegates.
However, Malatsi rejected the suggestion within the interview with TechCabal that the federal government had launched a brand new deadline for the AI policy. He stated the January 2027 reference and the top of the 2026/27 monetary 12 months weren’t separate dates, whereas reiterating his confidence that the policy would be finalised by the top of March.
The timetable locations duty on the independent AI review panel team led by Professor Benjamin Rosman of the Machine Intelligence and Neural Discovery Institute on the University of the Witwatersrand to restore confidence within the policy after the unique draft’s credibility collapsed.
Malatsi stated the panel had been working at tempo and that he remained assured it could ship a draft Cabinet might finalise. When the AI policy enters public session, he stated, authorities departments would have made inputs, adopted by engagement with civil society, residents, the non-public sector and different stakeholders.
The alternative policy will want to deal with greater than the failures uncovered by the quotation scandal. Despite the fabricated citations, Malatsi stated the withdrawn draft contained credible provisions, together with protections for South Africans’ rights and dignity on-line.
“As unfortunate as the withdrawal of the policy was, it was necessary given the stain that it had,” he acknowledged. “Much of the policy’s substance was credible, and everyone who has engaged with it has acknowledged that.”
The minister additionally pointed to the necessity for safeguards governing the moral use of AI, together with avenues for redress when the expertise is used improperly.
“The important thing for us is to ensure that when we create a regime for the ethical use and ethical adoption of AI, where the use is not ethical, there’s got to be an avenue for recourse,” he stated.
True scale calls for shifting past surface-level integrations to strong execution. We’ve filtered the noise out of Moonshot 2026, optimising the convention strictly for high-calibre connections between startup founders, world monetary operators, enterprise leaders and people rewiring Africa’s technical frameworks. Get 20% off Early Bird tickets for a limited time.
